Ready to review

AI coding gets interesting before the coding starts

You said the planning part is more useful than the coding part. I built the post around that line instead of the feature list.

Your draft

Updated yesterday

Click any paragraph to edit it.

Above the line is your hook — what people see before “see more”.

Tell me what to change

One thing would make this much stronger:

What happened the first time you used this on a real task?

I'll ask rather than invent it · ⌘↵

Details· what could be stronger, why it works, in your words, where it came from

Proof
Missing
You describe what the plugin can do, but don't show what actually happened when you used it.
Hook
Needs work
You're listing four features in the first sentence. A stronger opening would focus on one concrete result.
Body
Good
Clear and short. The “it stops guessing” line is the best part.
CTA
Good
Fine. Asking about a specific habit will get better replies than “thoughts?”.
AI-pattern check
Good
No “game-changer” or “in today's fast-paced world”. The context paragraph uses a list-of-three rhythm — keep an eye on that.
Idea
Strong
A real lesson from real work. This is worth posting.
Ending
Strong
The last line restates the idea in a way people will remember.
Voice
Strong
Sounds like your notes — short sentences, no buzzwords.

Specific opening
It starts from something you actually built instead of a generic statement about AI.
Credibility
It shows real professional experience — you built and use this tool.
Clear insight
It moves beyond describing a tool and lands on a broader lesson: understanding comes before code.
Positioning
It reinforces how you want to be known: AI-era software engineering, from someone who does the work.
Authenticity
It keeps your natural excitement (“what surprised me…”) rather than making it sound corporate.

Screenshot / product proof

You're describing something you built. Showing the plan it generated for a real ticket makes the post more believable.